Share this article
BTC
$84,511.11
-
0.83%ETH
$1,578.02
-
1.82%USDT
$0.9998
+
0.01%XRP
$2.0547
-
1.10%BNB
$588.92
-
0.09%SOL
$137.17
-
1.32%USDC
$0.9998
+
0.00%TRX
$0.2450
+
1.61%DOGE
$0.1539
-
2.42%ADA
$0.6146
-
1.22%LINK
$13.14
+
3.03%LEO
$9.3206
+
0.25%AVAX
$19.47
-
1.11%TON
$2.9930
+
0.74%XLM
$0.2418
-
1.32%SHIB
$0.0₄1235
+
1.57%HBAR
$0.1639
-
0.95%SUI
$2.1028
-
1.76%BCH
$333.74
-
0.33%HYPE
$17.29
-
4.25%Sign Up
- Back to menuPrices
- Back to menuResearch
- Back to menuConsensus
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menu
- Back to menuWebinars & Events
E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling
A court filing alleges federal government suppression of an OFR review led to crypto businesses being defined as money transmitters.

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.
- E-Gold's former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.
- Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals. At its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.
- The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007 and the project's directors pleaded guilty in 2008.
- The ex-directors now claim in court the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida's Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so it "could make an example" of E-Gold.
- Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter because the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.
- E-Gold's former directors claim the court's judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review
- The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of "money transmitter" in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.
- Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.
See the full filing below:
See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom
Paddy Baker
Paddy Baker is a London-based cryptocurrency reporter. He was previously senior journalist at Crypto Briefing.
Paddy holds positions in BTC and ETH, as well as smaller amounts of LTC, ZIL, NEO, BNB and BSV.
